Latest News • Breaking News • Global Updates
WN
WORLD'S NEWS TODAY
Independent News & Global Updates
BREAKING NEWS
Welcome to World's News Today — Read the latest news, India updates, world news, business, technology, sports and entertainment.

Top Stories

VIEW ALL

Latest News

LATEST
Showing posts with label Christchurch Video Ban. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Christchurch Video Ban. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 14, 2026

Fort Hood Shooter Execution: Why Australia Wants to Ban The Livestream

Fort Hood Shooter Execution: Why Australia Wants to Ban The Livestream Everyone knows who the Fort Hood shooter is. Nidal Hasan killed 13 of his own fellow soldiers in 2009. Everyone also knows he will be executed on December 3, 2026. But the real question Australians are asking is different - Why does Australia want to ban a video that is happening in America? The answer is not politics. The answer is a painful memory that Australia still has not forgotten. *Reason 1: The Christchurch Memory - Australia's Deepest Scar*
In 2019, a gunman live streamed the killing of 51 people in two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand, on Facebook Live. That video spread in Australia in just 10 minutes. Kids saw it on Instagram. Office workers saw it on Twitter. After that, Australia made the world's toughest law. The eSafety Commissioner was given power to order platforms to delete "abhorrent violent material" within 1 hour. Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young said this directly: "We told the world we would never allow a live murder to be broadcast into Australian homes again. If we allow a US firing squad to be live streamed, we are breaking our own promise from Christchurch." For Australians, a live execution and a live terrorist shooting feel the same - both are a live death on a screen. *Reason 2: The Wakeley Church Stabbing - The Law Was Used Just 6 Months Ago* In April 2024, a 16-year-old boy stabbed a bishop live on camera during a church service in Wakeley, Sydney. The video went viral on X. What did Australia do? eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant ordered X to remove the video not just in Australia, but GLOBALLY. Elon Musk fought it in court, but for 3 weeks the video was banned in Australia.
That case proved Australia _can_ block a foreign video. Now Greens are saying: "If you can block a Sydney stabbing video for our kids, you must block a Texas execution video too." *Reason 3: Australia is Against Death Penalty - It's Our Identity* This is the point many US websites are missing. Australia abolished the death penalty in 1973,Since then, Australia has been one of the loudest voices in the world against capital punishment. The Australian government, whether Labor or Coalition, has a policy: "We oppose the death penalty in all circumstances for all people." So when the US says "Come watch us shoot a man live," for Australia it is not just violent content. It is against our national values. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said this is why he called the stream "completely abhorrent." *Reason 4: The Children Safety Argument - The Strongest Point* This is the argument that will win in court. In Australia, if a child under 16 is on TikTok and suddenly an algorithm pushes a live execution of a man being shot by 7 rifles, who is responsible? Under the new Online Safety Act 2021, the platform is responsible. Communications Minister Anika Wells and eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant have been sent hundreds of emails from parents in last 48 hours saying "Don't let our kids see this." No politician in Australia, whether from Greens, Labor or Liberal, wants to go to an election after allowing kids to watch a firing squad live. *So What Will Australia Actually Do?* Here is the real plan, not the news headline: Step 1: eSafety will classify the livestream as RC - Refused Classification. That means it is illegal to show it in Australia. Step 2: eSafety will send a legal notice to Meta, Google (YouTube), TikTok and X. The notice will say "Put a geo-block on this URL for Australia." Step 3: If platforms don't block, they can be fined up to $782,500 per day under Australian law. But there is a loophole. If the Pentagon streams it directly from http://Defense.gov and not via YouTube, eSafety cannot block a .gov website directly. They can only block the copies that go viral. *Final Truth for Your Readers* Australia doesn't want to ban the livestream because it supports Nidal Hasan. No one in Australia supports him. Australia wants to ban it because Australia promised its people after Christchurch - "Never again will we let a live killing enter your phone." That promise is now being tested by the US military.